|

|

Add one part satire to two parts sincerity. Sprinkle on a couple of rants. Stir liberally.
RSS feed coming soon!
Daily Blah FAQ
Who are you?
I'm the newly-appointed Future editor at Business 2.0 and the former San Francisco correspondent for Time Magazine.
Wow, so does this mean everything you write reflects Time Inc's opinion? Or do you perhaps have some sort of standard disclaimer to the effect that it doesn't?
Naturally, the opinions contained in this blog are not those of my employers. In fact, some opinions may be the polar opposite of my employers. Some may be the same, for all I know. Hey, it's not like I ask my employers their opinions about everything in the news, okay? Let's just say that if this were a Venn diagram with one circle marked "my opinions" and the other one marked "my employers' opinions", there would doubtless be some overlap. But neither I nor my employers are able to pinpoint exactly where that overlap is.
What is this Daily Blah thing?
An experiment for a column I wrote about blogging back in December 2001. All these years later, I haven't been able to kick the habit.
If it's called Daily Blah, how come you don't ... hey, wait, you're writing every day!
See? Told you I'd try harder.
Mister, you talk funny. Are you one of them furrners?
Why yes I am, as it happens. I was born, raised and educated in Great Britain. I've been living in the U.S. since 1996 and identify as British.
I say, old chap, you forgot the "u" in "colour."
No I didn't. I may identify as British, but I am also an American journalist writing for an American audience about mostly American issues. These two different sides of me are a constant source of tension. Nevertheless, Daily Blah will adhere to American English grammar and spelling.
Praise for Daily Blah:
"It is fun to watch the author's navel-gazing joy." - Sunday Times (UK)
"It's really funny and informative." - Dave Eggers, author
"The Blah is becoming a daily destination for me." - Richard Marsh, Playwright
"I like it, and I don't." - Fiona Hogg, Teacher
"Better than Xanax." - Lessley Andersen, journalist
"Dude, lay off the crack pipe." - Souris Hong-Porretta, gamesmith
Friends, Bloggers, Countrymen ... lend your ears to these people. I come not to bury them, but praise them.
Arik
Bill
Dan
Cole
Emily B
Emily G
Helena
Jee
Jewelz
Kaila
Kathryn
Mac
Robin
Slim
Souris
Mr. West
My TIME articles
All magazine articles (subscription required for older stories)
Online column index
|
|

|
|
|
Daily Blah for... Thursday, October 16, 2003
Time for a Change
SACRAMENTO: California's governor-elect has been sent back in time to preemptively eliminate a chief rival from the 2006 gubernatorial election, the Schwarzenegger campaign revealed last night.
The target of the temporal assassination was Sarah Connor, a Los Angeles-based waitress. In 1984, where Schwarzenegger has been sent, Connor was about to give birth to a son, John -- who, it is alleged, will become the greatest Democratic operative California has ever known.
"Sure, it might seem like hardball," said Schwarzenegger political advisor George Gorton. "But you haven't seen this kid. In his twenties, he becomes this incredibly telegenic orator. We simply couldn't take the risk of him going head to head with Arnold in the next campaign."
Outraged by what he called "an unprecedented politicization of the space-time continuum", Democratic lieutenant governor Cruz Bustamante announced he had sent back an operative of his own to save Sarah Connor's life. If that were successful, however, it is believed Republicans could attempt the assassination again at a later date, perhaps with a robot even more deadly than Schwarzenegger. "In which case," Bustamante told reporters, "we would be forced to capture Arnold, reprogram him and send him back to protect the teenage John Connor."
|
|
|

|